亚城论坛

用户名  找回密码
 立即注册
搜索
热搜: 活动 交友 discuz
楼主: 老钱

老钱:美国大选,选谁?(四)不搞“阶级斗争”

[复制链接]
匿名  发表于 2012-10-8 17:14:43
老钱坚定地为穷人羞愧,为富人说话
回复

使用道具

匿名  发表于 2012-10-8 19:24:27
,
回复

使用道具

匿名  发表于 2012-10-8 19:50:18
老钱不愧是文革过来的,动不动就阶级斗争,上纲上线的,很有一套啊。
回复

使用道具

匿名  发表于 2012-10-8 20:49:46
老钱还是很consistent的,网上网下他都喜欢给人上课,但他长篇大论的最后,就是给他不喜欢的人扣上一顶大帽子,要么是不民主,要么是不守规则,现在又来了阶级斗争。同样的事他和他的一伙干就没事,别人干了就是滔天大罪。大致如此。
回复

使用道具

1

主题

22

帖子

52

积分

会员

积分
52
发表于 2012-10-8 20:54:08 | 显示全部楼层
老钱真当自己是棵葱了。
回复

使用道具 举报

匿名  发表于 2012-10-8 20:57:35
引用第10楼游客于2012-10-08 16:10发表的  :
风险大税率就应该低? 你自个编的理由吧!那赌博和彩票的风险还大,那么它们的税率应该更低? 啥逻辑?从没看到哪个税法按风险定税率的。


investment creates jobs.  赌博和彩票 doesn't.  The tax code is trying to encourage job creation by giving investor a lower tax rate in exchange for thier risk.
回复

使用道具

匿名  发表于 2012-10-8 21:21:41
没赌博赌场的工作机会从哪里来?那些做金融衍生物的又产生什么工作机会?那些做外包投资的又产生什么工作机会?在美国股市的又不只是美国公司,投资外国公司的也不创造美国的工作机会但税率还是低. 投资不一定和创造工作机会有关。
引用第17楼游客于2012-10-08 20:57发表的  :

investment creates jobs.  赌博和彩票 doesn't.  The tax code is trying to encourage job creation by giving investor a lower tax rate in exchange for thier risk.  
回复

使用道具

匿名  发表于 2012-10-8 21:24:37
引用第18楼一剪梅于2012-10-08 21:17发表的  :

Only a few people can be job creators, majority must be willing to take jobs from others. I see a lot of job searching news/tips/webstes, not nearly as many job creation resources. Because the reality wouldn't allow everyone rush to start his/her own business. It would certaining make the economy much worse.
That's exactly why the successful job creators should be rewarded with high pay and  lower tax rate (debatable about the amount).  Since for every successful one, there are many who failed and may lose their entire life saving.  Who would take the risk without higher return?
回复

使用道具

匿名  发表于 2012-10-8 21:35:05
The economy needs investment to create jobs! And in many ways, it does. But when we tax income from investments at such a low rate (capped at 15 percent), much of what we're rewarding isn't really job creation. After all, if I invest in a start-up company and provide that company with some of the capital they need to expand, I've helped to create jobs. But let's say I buy a few shares of General Electric and then sell them a few months later after the share price goes up. Has my investment created any jobs? No. When I bought the shares, the money didn't go to G.E. so they could build a new plant—if they decide to do that, it'll be because they have demand for their products and the money to build it. My money went to another investor looking to sell his shares. The trading of G.E.'s shares is just me and a bunch of other investors gaining or losing some money depending on the movement of the share price.
引用第21楼一剪梅于2012-10-08 21:30发表的  :

Sure. Then share your bigger return with us too. That's the only way to be fair
回复

使用道具

匿名
匿名  发表于 2012-10-8 21:35:44
引用第11楼游客于2012-10-08 17:14发表的 :
老钱坚定地为穷人羞愧,为富人说话

老钱在文章里谈到,在美国,穷富不一定是天生的,世袭的。今天的所谓“富人”昨天曾是穷人,今天的某些穷人昨天可能是“富人”。 所以;
------------------
老钱坚定地为那些满足于不劳而获去花别人钱的的所谓“穷人”羞愧,
为那些通过个人努力成功致富的所谓“富人”说话。
-----------------------
鉴定完毕。顶老钱!
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

Archiver|小黑屋|Atlanta168.com

GMT-5, 2024-11-24 15:01 , Processed in 0.100758 second(s), 18 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表