(ZT) 贺绍强就是一无赖加流氓

They were fighters to use the loophole of the system (sent their daughter to another family for insurance). They were the fighters to keep their status legal to stay here by doing whatever they could. If they truly loved their daughter, why they refused to accept the child when Baker's family sent her back the first time? someone may argue that because they were poor. We Chinese always say "狗不嫌家贫" but what if it is the other way around?

引用第18楼游客于2010-03-04 22:53发表的 回 15楼(游客) 的帖子 :
This is 9楼 回 15楼. Do you know what means "Indecency parent" and what means "Dis-functional family"? They have nothing to do with rich or poor. If they loved the child, how could they had to fight for custodian rights from another family from first place?  

我是15楼（3楼）

你不用反复强调“Indecency parent”，"Dis-functional family"，还是“decency parent”，"functional family"，田纳西高等法院的终审判决，就是针对你这一说法、以及其他疑问的答案。

不敢恭维你的中文水平，是否能够理解“儿不嫌母丑”、“狗不嫌家贫”这一中华民族的传统美德。希望小贺梅终有一天能参透这一人生道理。

如果你是成人，你应该照顾你的父母，不管他们是怎样的人，只要他们养育了你。可是为什么要让一个幼儿承担做父亲的丑恶灵魂和不付责任的后果？

您应该可以在田纳西高等法院的终审判决里，找到针对你这一说法、以及其他疑问的答案。