Zorro: 警惕Romney的反对者们用数字误导

引用第27楼游客于2012-10-11 22:39发表的 Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:回 11楼(一剪梅) 的帖子 :
没投过proxy吧? 美国总统至少还有两个可挑，还有竞选辩论你让你知道他们的主见， 公司的董事会除了很偶尔的情况外，都只有一套董事会推荐名单，还有一个选项是全部同意董事会的推荐人，一般除非有大家伙自己出面出钱搞proxy war，那些董事会候选人除了履历外其他情况都一抹黑，股民没任何挑选余地。

That's true that average share holders can't nominate board members.  however, they can vote no.  if majority share holders do that, it could happen.  I will still think that most share holders just rubber stamp the proxy and not exersize their rights.

Just curious. Zorro, 你就是传说中的119吗？ 我觉得观点，语气都很像。如果是，恭喜你有了马甲。

引用第31楼游客于2012-10-12 10:28发表的  :
Just curious. Zorro, 你就是传说中的119吗？ 我觉得观点，语气都很像。如果是，恭喜你有了马甲。

哈哈，我在上次写了“他胡汉三又回来了，猜猜是谁”，就是这意思。
很像：
1. 纯美国人
2. 对名校纠结有看法
3. 纠正Dr. Liu的翻译
4. 对女士不太礼貌
5. 当然讲话口气很一致。

正在等口头禅做最后判断。

如果不是，抱歉了。

Zorro

引用第30楼游客于2012-10-12 10:27发表的 Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:回 11楼(一剪梅) 的帖子 :

That's true that average share holders can't nominate board members.  however, they can vote no.  if majority share holders do that, it could happen.  I will still think that most share holders just rubber stamp the proxy and not exersize their rights.

I receive proxy vote request all the time but never voted once.  Why? It's not worth the time and effort for a small share holder like me.  Like I said before, often times, the CEO pay only accounts for no more than 1% of the company profit.  And unlike Presidential election, which has wider ramifications, the CEO pay is just about money, and very small money to me.  So I will let the big whales worry about that.

钱老

Zorro和老钱都是轮子功的？要练功就去好好练功搞这些政治干吗？

There you go. If all voters are smart, we don't need this debate to begin with. The majorities are just dum a$$ like Lao Qian and his supporters. That's why things are never easy as you thought.

引用第30楼游客于2012-10-12 10:27发表的 Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:回 11楼(一剪梅) 的帖子 :

That's true that average share holders can't nominate board members.  however, they can vote no.  if majority share holders do that, it could happen.  I will still think that most share holders just rubber stamp the proxy and not exersize their rights.